Final Essay

Advancements of Web 2.0 have made communicating and the use of social networking sites more convenient for our society today. It enables people to share and retrieve information with one another at an instant. An excellent example of a Web 2.0 medium is Cyworld. Cyworld is a popular social networking site which is heavily used in South Korea. It can be compared to social networking sites in the U.S. such as Facebook and MySpace. However, Cyworld has much more to offer than both Facebook and MySpace combined. Cyworld’s main page can be compared to sites such as MSN or Yahoo!. Users have the option of using Cyworld’s main page as a search engine, as well as to read the most up-to-date news. However, that is not what most registered users access Cyworld for. The main feature of this social networking medium is creating a personal homepage, which is also known as a “Minihome.”

For starters, one must register to be a member of Cyworld at no cost. The user then creates a virtual room which will appear on the front page of his or her Minihome. There are many options when creating this virtual room. The room can be decorated with different interior, including room colors and different furniture; or it can even look like the outdoor scenery. Then the user goes on to create a character, or an avatar, which is called “Minime,” to live in this virtual room. Like the virtual room, there are many options when creating the avatar. The user can modify their Minime to have different facial features, skin colors, different hair styles, as well as clothing, accessories, and even the Minime’s pets. There is also the option of changing the mood of you Minime. To further decorate your Minihome, users can purchase what is called “dotori,” which translates in English to “acorn.” This is the online currency used in Cyworld. Dotori can be used to purchase templates for your Minihome, songs, accessories for the virtual room and the Minime, as well as have the option of purchasing gifts for friends on Cyworld, Cybuddies. The usage of “dotori” for Cyworld users can be compared to Facebook to a certain extent. Facebook users have the option of buying virtual gifts for their friends on Facebook, as well as pay money for various applications. However, Facebook users do not have the option of purchasing templates or songs to enhance the look of their page. According to an article on CNNMoney.com, the daily revenue from selling “dotori” is estimated to be around $300,000 in U.S. dollars. Also, in 2006, Cyworld was expected to make $100 million for Cyworld’s virtual inventory. (CNNMoney.com)

After creating the virtual room on the front page, the user can then go on with creating different pages throughout their Minihome. The Minihomes are organized in a unique fashion. Each Minihome has tabs, where each tab leads the navigator to different secions of the user’s homepage. The tabs have titles such as: Home, Profile, Photos, Bulletin Board, Message Board, and Guest Book. Then the user is able to further categorize and organize their information and data by creating subfolders within each tab. There are no size limits when posting or uploading data or documents such as pictures, videos, music, and diary entries. Cyworld also has the option of being able to post photos straight from a mobile phone onto the Minihome, just like Facebook and MySpace has offered their users recently. The way Cyworld is set up with the different tabs makes this social networking site extremely user-friendly and allows people to easily navigate from one page to the next.

After creating the Minihome, users can do what is called “wave riding,” by browsing other members’ Minihomes. Each user has a friend’s list, like other social networking sites such as Facebook and/or MySpace. The friends on these lists are called “cybuddies.” Being Cybuddies allows users to comment on each other’s pages, just like any other social networking site allows. While “wave riding,” a user may find a photo or a particular post to be interesting. The user then has the option of bringing that post and adding it onto his/her own page as well, just as long as the two members are Cybuddies.

There is no discrimination when it comes to which types of people register to use Cyworld. There are no written sources for the exact demographics and numbers on Cyworld users, except that 90 percent of all people in their 20's are registered users of Cyworld (Cnnmoney.com). However, it is obvious that people of every age group and many different occupations all come together on this social networking site and build what can be called to be their “virtual world.” As explained in an article in BusinessWeek, Cyworld is not just another website to some people; it is the nexus of everything a person does. Shin Byun Hwi, senior manager at SK Communications, mentions in the article that the company’s goal is “making users’ online activities entwined with their offline life.” And Cyworld does just that. It is almost as if the user bringing his or her life in the “real world” into the “virtual world.” It has lured so many people that it is almost uncommon for a person in Korea to not own a Minihompi. Cyworld users have been labeled as “Cyholics,” due to the addiction of constantly updating and wave riding on Cyworld.

So who is the brain behind this extraordinary social networking medium? There is not much known on the original founders except that Cyworld was founded in 1999 by four graduates of KAIST, which is known as the MIT of Korea. At first the site was thought of as a “personal contact website, a way to connect to your immediate circle of friends and family.” It was then bought by SK Telecom, a mobile company, which is a subsidiary to SK Communications, in 2003. In merely less than four years of the site’s laughing, almost a third of the South Korean population has become registered members of Cyworld. Also, according to an article from 2007 in Korea Times, it was stated that Cyworld is now the largest online community site with more than 20 million members.

Cywold has already set up localized versions in countries such as Japan, China, and Taiwan, and most recently, in the United Sates. An article in Tech Crunch states that SK Communications funded $10 million along with a 30 person office in San Francisco to the U.S. version in hopes to make Cyworld as successful as it is in South Korea. However, the CEo of the U.S. version of CYworld, Henry Chon, has admitted that the Korean version of Cyworld is “a little too cutesy” for the American taste. Chon teamed up with native Korean and American staffs to debate on which features they should keep and which ones they should get rid of. The final appearance of the product varies a bit in some aspects but is not much different from that of the Korean version. The users of the U.S. version still have the option of customizing their MInihomes by purchasing “acorns.” However, Chon expected the revenue to come from advertising, rather than selling virtual items. There have been many debates about whether Cyworld will topple MySpace or not. One aspect of Cyworld that MySpace lacks is the way Cyworld is organized with the different menu tabs. However, one limitation of Cyworld is that users of the different versions in each of the countres are not able to be “Cybuddies” with one another, nor are they able to “wave ride” and port data from one county’s Cyworld to another.

Cyworld has much to offer in Asia, and has lured so many people into become members. Although it became an instant phenomenon in South Korea, it failed to produce the same gaudy numbers it has produced in its own region. One reason that could have led to their demise is that the operators of Cyworld are simply just out of touch with the American culture. This is evident in CEO Henry Chon’s statement about the Korean version being “too cutesy” for the taste of American culture. This statement alone shows that although Web 2.0 has taken many steps forward in advancements globally, it is unable to satisfy people of all regions in the same way. This is simply due to the fact that different people from different regions do not all have the same purpose when taking advantages of the many tools that Web 2.0 has to offer. Although SK Telecom has succeeded in making Cyworld such a successful Web 2.0 tool in South Korea, it appears that they still have a lot of changes to undergo in order to please the American culture as much as they have been pleasing the Korean users of Cyworld.

Essay 2: E-mail Lists

For our second essay, we were instructed to observe a pre-World Wide Web social medium. Social mediums such as IRC, MUDs/MOOs, email lists, or Usenet, allows people to communicate with one another about various topics of interest. These groups of people may be complete strangers, or it may even be composed of a group of friends or acquaintances.

The social media I chose to observe was an e-mail list from Yahoo. As mentioned in the reading by Kollock and Smith, e-mail lists can be compared to a Bulletin Board System (BBS). It allows users to write posts which will then be e-mailed to each of the members in the group. The group members then have the option of reading the message and posting up a reply to that message, which will then be sent out to every member in the group as well. The name of the group I observed was called “Relationship-Talk: Expert Advice on Love & Dating.” From reading the title, I felt that there would be a wide range of people participating in this group, and I got as many as 81 messages in one day! This proved to me that this e-mail group was very active.

When communicating on the internet, gender becomes a big issue. Judging from the name of this group, I was expecting the group members to be mostly females, rather than males. This is simply due to the fact that females are stereotyped to be more about the “love” thing while males prefer not to talk about it, and would much rather deal with it in their own way. However, much to my surprise, there were just as many males as there were females. As mentioned in one of the readings as well as in class, there are often many cases where one gender may be impersonating the opposite gender, and vice versa. However, I did not feel as if this was a big issue in this group. Nonetheless, I felt that there really was no need for one gender to try to impersonate the other gender. Often times it was clear to me from just by the user name whether or not the writer was a male or a female. However, there were the occasional ambiguous usernames. If this was the case, the content that the user wrote about hinted out clues to what their gender was. Some examples of these context clues would be things like “I love this man so much….,” “My girlfriend & I have been together for awhile..,” and so on. The hard part about figuring out the gender of the writer was when a user replied to a message. Unless the user was comparing the situation to his/her own, it was often hard to figure out if the writer was a male or a female. The most recent observation of this case was when a woman had written about not spending enough time with her boyfriend. She had been complaining that they only spend time twice a week. As a reply, one user posted “Twice a week? That’s longer than what I get, count your blessings.”

Kollock & Smith discuss topics such as managing virtual commons, problems with cooperation, and running into social dilemmas in cyberspace. It didn’t really occur to me that there were too many issues concerning those topics in this particular e-mail group. Of course, all those topics would be viewed differently from each person’s point of view, but it seemed to me that everyone was being polite and sympathized with what the writer of the each post had to say. It may have been easy for the members to open up and write about their personal problems because of the simple fact that although we were all strangers, we knew that we wouldn’t be judged, as we would be if we were to talk about issues to our friends and/or families.

In conclusion, I was surprised to find how many males were actually posting up messages. I was also surprised to find that the members were all sympathetic of the problems and dilemmas mentioned by the writers. One thing I realized was that because everyone is a stranger, the criticisms or things that might have been perceived as negative if said by a friend/family, were perceived in a different light. The writer might see and understand things a bit different when told by a stranger rather than a close friend or a family. Although there are many rising problems from communicating on the internet, observing this particular group reassured me that there are still many people out there who do not take advantage of the fact that we are behind a screen and anonymous.



Works Cited:
Kollock, Peter & Smith, Marc. (1996). Managing the virtual commons: Cooperation and conflict in computer communities. In Susn C. Herring (Ed.), Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social and cross-cultural perspectives (pp. 109-128). Philadelphia: John Benjamines

Web 2.0 : CyWorld

Advancements of Web 2.0 have made communicating on the internet more convenient for our society today. It enables people to share and retrieve information with one another at an instant. Web 2.0 technologies have also become user-friendly which has made it easy for almost anyone to sit in front of the computer and have access to the World Wide Web. Also, social networks are created within the World Wide Web community which enables users to interact with different people, as well as belong to a certain network or a community on the web. Being a part of the online community also widens our social network and can often be a big help to many people in the “real world.”

An excellent example of a Web 2.0 medium is Cyworld. Cyworld is a popular social networking site which is heavily used in South Korea. It can be compared to social networking sites in the U.S. such as Facebook and MySpace. However, Cyworld has much more to offer than both Facebook and MySpace combined. Cyworld’s main page can be compared to sites such as MSN or Yahoo. Users have the option of using the Cyworld’s main page as a search engine, as well as to read the most up-to-date news. However, that is not what most registered users access Cyworld for. Cyworld’s main feature is creating a personal homepage, which is called a “Minihome.”

For starters, after you have registered to Cyworld at no cost, the user creates a virtual room which will appear on the front page of his or her Minihome. There are many options when creating this virtual room. The room can be decorated with different interior including room colors and different furniture; or it can even look like the outdoor scenery. Then the user goes on to create a character, or an avatar known as “Minime,” to live in this virtual room. Like the virtual room, there are many options when creating the avatar, such as facial features to skin colors, different hair colors and styles, as well as the character’s clothing, accessories, and even their pets. There is also the unique option of being able to change the mood of your avatar. To further decorate the virtual room and add different templates to your homepage, there is a virtual currency used in Cyworld called “dotori,” which means acorn in English. Users can purchase “dotori” online and use this currency to buy different templates and/or songs for their homepage, as well as buying gifts, templates, and songs for other Cyworld users. The usage of “dotori” for Cyworld users can be compared to Facebook to a certain extent. Facebook users have the option of buying virtual gifts for their friends on Facebook, as well as pay money for applications. However, Facebook users do not have the option of purchasing templates or songs to enhance the look of their page. According to CNNMoney.com, the daily revenue from selling “dotori” is estimated to be around $300,000 in U.S. dollars. Also, in 2006, Cyworld was expected to make $100 million for Cyworld’s virtual inventory. (CNNMoney.com)

After creating the virtual room on the front page, the user can then go on with creating different pages. Cyworld is organized in tabs, where each tab leads you to different sections of the user’s homepage. The tabs have titles such as: Home, Profile, Photos, Bulletin Board, Message Board, and Guest Book. Then the user is able to further categorize and organize their information and data by creating subfolders within each tab. There are no size limits when posting data or documents such as pictures, videos, music, and diary entries. Cyworld also has the option of being able to post photos straight from your mobile phone onto your homepage, just like Facebook and MySpace has offered their users recently. The way Cyworld is set up with the different tabs makes this social networking site extremely user-friendly and allows people to easily navigate from one page to the next.

After creating your Minihome, users can do what is called “wave riding,” by browsing other member’s Minihomes. Each user has a friend’s list, like Facebook and/or MySpace, which are called “cybuddies.” This allows users to comment on each other’s pages, just like any other social networking site does. While “wave riding,” a user may find a photo or a particular post to be interesting. The user then has the option of bringing that post and adding it onto his/her own page as well, as long as the two members are “cybuddies.”

There is no discrimination when it comes to which types of people register to use Cyworld. People of every age group and many different occupations all come together on this social networking site and build what can be called to be their “virtual world.” As explained in an article in BusinessWeek, Cyworld is not just another website to some people; it is the nexus of everything a person does. According to Shin Byung Hwi, senior manager at SK Communications, mentioned in an article in BusinessWeek that the company’s goal is “making users’ online activities entwined with their offline life.” Cyworld does just that. It is almost as if the user is bringing his or her life in the “real world” into the “virtual world.”

Cyworld was first founded in 1999 by four graduates of KAIST, which is known as the MIT of Korea. At first the site was thought of as “a personal contact website, a way to connect to your immediate circle of friends and family.” It was then bought by SK Telecom, a mobile company, which is a subsidiary to SK Communications in 2003. Today this social networking site is heavily used in South Korea amongst various age groups. In merely less than four years of the site’s launching, almost a third of the South Korean population has become registered members of Cyworld.

Cyworld has already set up localized versions in countries like Japan, China, and Taiwan, and most recently in the United States. SK Communications funded $10 million along with a 30 person office in San Francisco to the U.S. version in hopes to make Cyworld as successful as it is in South Korea. However, the CEO of the U.S. version of Cyworld, Henry Chon, has admitted that the Korean version of Cyworld is “a little too cutesy” for the American taste. Chon teamed up with native Korean and American staffs to debate on which features they should keep and which ones they should get rid of. The final appearance of the product is not much different from that of the Korean version. The U.S. version is still organized and categorized with different tabs. The users of the U.S. version still have the option of customizing their Minihomes by purchasing “acorns.” However, Chon expected the revenue to come from advertising, rather than selling virtual items. There have been many debates about whether Cyworld will topple MySpace or not. One aspect of Cyworld that MySpace does not offer is the way it is organized. Cyworld is neatly organized in tabs and folders whereas Myspace does not give you options of having different folders on the user’s page, rather they have just recently offered an option to make folders for the user’s photo albums. However, one limitation of Cyworld is that users of the different versions in each of the countries are not able to be “Cybuddies” with one another, nor are they able to “wave ride” and port data from one country’s Cyworld to another.

Although Cyworld became an instant phenomena in South Korea, as well as the other Asian markets it has been distributed to, it failed to produce the same gaudy numbers it had produced in its own region. One reason that could have led to their demise is that the operators of Cyworld are simply just out of touch with the American culture. This is evident in CEO Henry Chon’s statement of the Korean version of Cyworld is “too cutesy” for the taste of American culture. This statement alone shows that although Web 2.0 has taken many steps forward in advancements, it is unable to satisfy people of all regions in the same way. This is simply due to the fact that people from different areas and different occupations do not all have the same purpose when taking advantages of the many tools that Web 2.0 has to offer.

Cyworld has so much to offer in Asia, especially in South Korea. It has lured so many people to this social networking site that it is almost uncommon for a person in Korea to not be a Cyworld user. Because the addiction to this extraordinary site is so prevalent, they have even been labeled as “Cyholics.” Although SK Telecom has succeeded in making Cyworld such a successful Web 2.0 tool in South Korea, it appears that they still have a lot of changes to make in order to please the American culture as much as they have been pleasing the Korean users of Cyworld.

Social Networking

For today’s reading, we were assigned to read chapter 9 of Clay Shirky’s Here Comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations. Shirky explains relationships within social networks. The chapter starts off by comparing how small this world is, and almost uses statistics on explaining why or how we would coincidentally run into people in the ‘real world.’ In Shirky’s explanation, it is made clear that it is not in fact that the world is small, rather it is due to the fact that we are connected to each other, and have built some sort of relationship/connection amongst a certain group of people through social networking or through people we know in common.

Shirky explains the research by Duncan Watts and Steve Strogatz, which is known as the “Small World network.” This research shows we are first connected through people in one certain group, and within that group, each individual is connected to someone who belongs to a different group, which enables each of the group members in that certain group to be tied to other people who do not belong the group you belong to. Shirky talks about adopting strategies such as “dense and sparse connections.” These strategies allow you to connect within a smaller group, and then connecting all those small groups together in order to build a bigger network. This can be related to a tool that is newly available on Facebook. Facebook has made a tool called “People You May Know.” In this list, there are people who you are not friends with, but people whom you have friends in common with. It allows Facebook members to meet or friend people through the relationship of common friends, or it can be served as a tool where you can find people whom you are already friends with, but just never knew they had a Facebook account.

I found the last section of this chapter to be interesting. The section is titled “It’s Not How Many People You Know, It’s How Many Kinds.” This section talks about the Ronald Burt’s research on relationships amongst things such as good/bad ideas, social structure and capital. The research takes a closer look at the relationships in the staff of a company. By connecting with people in the company, the staffs are able to come up with good ideas, but also bad ideas or failures as well. This idea can not only be related to companies, but to anyone in other situations. It is always good to build a large social network for various reasons. One reason that we can relate to as college students is searching for a jobs. By knowing a lot of people and being connected through a large network, you have more options and it is easier to find a job through the help of people within your social network, or even through people you may not know, but the people in your network knows.

We all belong to a social network, whether it may be big or small. In my opinion, building new connections and finding people within a network is not something that requires much effort. Such tools on Facebook makes it a lot more convenient for us to “add a friend” to our network on Facebook. Although it is always a good thing to have a large social network, there can also come negative outcomes from it as well. It all depends on the kinds of people you connect with, and the way you carry yourself within these social networks.






Works Cited:
Shirky, Clay (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations (chapter 9). New York: Penguin.

Observing Blogs - The NY Mets (essay #4)

In today’s society, blogging has vastly spread across the whole globe, that it has actually created a community of its own. Within the blogging community, there are no limitations or requirements as to who can blog, who can read and comment on these blogs, or what you can blog about. It’s basically like an on-line journal or diary in which you can share with the whole world whatever you wish to write about, and receive feedbacks and comments from unknown readers from all over the place. There are many blogs dedicated to a certain topic and for a certain audience, but there are also blogs that are just for your personal use, like a diary of your daily life.

Having to observe and follow up on one particular blog, I chose to participate in a blog dedicated to the NY Mets. Although it is clearly stated in the header of this blog that this blog is owned by Matthew Cerrone, there are other contributors posting on this blog aside from Matthew Cerrone. Cerrone and his team blog about the Mets team in general, the minor league system, free agent tracking, injuries amongst the players around the league, as well as trade rumors. The majority of the audience of this blog is stated obvious; they are probably all Mets fans. Though I have had experience with this blog prior to observing it in greater depth, I have never participated and interacted with the readers. Being a Mets fan myself, I was eager to see what people had to say about the various topics that are posted on this blog.

Due to the fact that this is a sports blog, I was able to feel that there was a lot of tension amongst the faithful readers. People would write comments on not only the post itself, but to other people’s comments as well. This created what seemed like a conversation amongst the readers of this blog. It seemed as if there was a community that existed only within this Mets blog. It was difficult for me to keep up with all the comments on each post because there were numerous comments being posted throughout the day. Also, the blog was updated with new posts several times a day, which led me to believe that there is heavy traffic on this site.

It was a unique experience for me to keep up with a blog that is dedicated to a team in which all the participants shared a love for. However, what was even more appealing to me was how although we all share a common interest and dedication to this team, we all had such different opinions and feelings toward each topic that was being talked about. The Mets had a rocky season this past year, which left one too many fans disappointed and angry. I feel that this past season has a lot to do with what these readers were posting in response to the entries as well as towards each other’s comments. Some were positive, but there were also many comments being posted back and forth that certainly did not seem too friendly. I even experienced someone giving me a negative feedback on one of the comments I have made about signing a player to the Mets, who is currently a free agent. It wasn’t as hateful as some of the other comments I have read, it was certain that this person was disagreeing with what I had to say. Although it was not a friendly conversation, it was still exciting conversing with someone who was a complete stranger and waiting for him/her to reply back to my comments.

As I have mentioned in the beginning that blogging is for anyone and everyone, Aaron Barlow discusses in his book Blogging America, The New Public Sphere, about the growing problem of minimal filtering within the blogging community, as well as criticisms that blogging is made “too easy.” It is easy for me to relate why some people would want a “Blogging Code of Conduct,” from the Mets blog. Though we are all fans of the same baseball team, I see readers posting comments bashing on the Mets players and their performances. In return, other readers would reply to such comments by writing comments that are distasteful. There would be nasty disputes going on back and forth, some that may not even be appropriate for the younger audiences. It is difficult to filter out these kinds of comments because it is a public blog and people are allowed to say whatever is on their minds. However, it is a sports blog after all, and aren’t sports for people of all ages? It would be nice if some of these adults behind the screen were just a bit more considerate of what they were writing on these blogs for the public’s view. Not only is it inappropriate for the younger crowd, I also think it’s distasteful for a fan to bash on the team they’re rooting for. It shows bad sportsmanship, but we all know what people say about New York fans, whether it be for football or baseball.

Opposed to the minimal filtering in the blogging community, I also think there is a positive side to what the people are criticizing for about blogging being “too easy.” Blogs such as the Mets blog enables a regular everyday person to go on the site, read about their favorite team as if they were reading it in a newspaper, and even be able to write feedback and converse with other readers with a few simple clicking of the mouse. It may even be better than reading an article in the paper or watching something on the news because the authors of the website write about topics and give information about the team that news reporters would not. For some, if not most fans, blogs such as the Mets blog might be of more interest to them rather than reading or hearing news about the Mets on the radio or in the papers.

In conclusion, observing the Mets blog helped me realize that blogging can give people a sense of belonging to a certain community. When we are behind the screen it does not matter who we are or what we look like, but rather what we have to say about the topic being talked about.

Works Cited:

Barlow, A (2008). Blogging @merica: the new public sphere. Westport, CT: Praeger Publishers.

Reaction to Kendall

The article by Lori Kendall titled “Shout into the wind, and it shouts back,” talks about Kendall’s two year participant observation research. Kendall became a member of LiveJournal and began to post entries while keeping up with other people’s LiveJournals. She then gathered a group of people who were once or still was an active member of LiveJournal. Kendall’s interviewees were between their 20’s and 30’s, while the majority of LiveJournal members are usually in their teens.

An interesting topic she interviewed people about was how these people use LiveJournal or what they use it for. There were some interviewees that firmly believed that you should not post every little detail of your daily life because it is simply too ‘boring’ for the readers, or that they should create “cut tags,” which enables the user to create a hyperlink to the part of their entry that is too long, or unnecessary for the readers to read about. Then there were those who believed that LiveJournal was just like their diary they would write on paper by hand, and that it should not conflict with the fact that there is in fact an audience who is reading about your daily events.

All the different feelings towards blogging for the public and for your own privacy make sense if you look at it from one point of view, or another. To me, I think you have the freedom to write about anything you want, especially on your personal blog. Blogs can be used in many different ways. Some blogs are used to inform others about certain topics, news, information, such as the NY Mets blog, which I have been observing for the past week. Other blogs can solely be for one’s personal use, as in someone’s diary where he/she records thoughts and events from the individual’s day to day life. The whole issue of minimal filtering from Barlow’s Blogging America can be brought up again. It relates to this issue of whether or not bloggers should think about what they’re writing before they actually post it up for the public to read. If the blog is supposed to be informative then yes, I agree that there should be somewhat of a filtering and the author should think twice about what they are writing. However, personal blogs should not have any sort of “conduct” or limit someone from writing what the want.

Observing Blogs 5

All the posts that were put up today so far weren't much of an interest to me. The most recent one was about Bobby Ojeda (who I'm not too familiar with), joining the SNY broadcast team in 2009. Then there was a post about the Mets trying to work out a deal with Bobby Jenks from the White Sox, as well as a post about the Tim Lincecum, a player for the Giant's winning the NL Cy Young Award. 2nd place for the NL Cy Young Award went to Brandon Webb, a player for the Diamondbacks and finally, Johan Santana, a starting pitcher for the NY Mets. It was a bit disappointing to see that Johan didn't win the Cy Young Award for the National League, but I guess I wasn't really expecting him to come in 1st place for the award.

I had to scroll back several posts in order to get to the post I commented on and was waiting for a reply on because this blog is heavily updated throughout the day. To my surprise, there wasn't much of a response from whom I have been conversing with.